Hit or Miss? Claire Danes and Michelle Pfieffer
I miss old Hollywood glamour when actresses used to dress up for the red carpet premieres. The red carpet has lost its magic over the past years, as premieres grew more common.
Here Claire Danes and Michelle Pfieffer wear no-fuss dresses to the Stardust premiere. I think both dresses are cute and that they look wonderful in them. But while I enjoy the simplicity of Claire’s dress and how she accessorized it, I don’t like Michelle’s dress for a premiere.
What do you think? Which version of simplicity do you prefer?
Source
Dreamy said,
July 30, 2007 @ 1:18 pm
Claire Danes for sure! nevertheless I like Pfieffer’s hair style & make up
Yara said,
July 30, 2007 @ 1:32 pm
None but if i have to choose then its Claire. I dont like short dresses for the red carpet
Ansam said,
July 30, 2007 @ 1:33 pm
I like Michelle Pfeiffer overall look over Claire Danes… the woman is what now? 49-50? and she is aging gracefully!
She can look like this effortlessly! I love her!
Ansam said,
July 30, 2007 @ 1:35 pm
ohh and I like that “Hit or Miss” is back
joanna said,
July 30, 2007 @ 10:54 pm
I like them both only because i like both actresses; otherwise the dresses are so off (yawn) the (yawn) rack (yawn) bcbg… but i guess you cant look original everyday… even that gets boring…
Zahra said,
July 31, 2007 @ 5:32 pm
Dreamy I agree
Yara why not? They can look elegant too
Ansam Yes, Michelle is turning 50! She looks gorgeous for her age but then actresses always do
Thanks, I’m glad too! I’ve missed them. Thanks for the push 
joanna true!
B.S said,
July 31, 2007 @ 6:39 pm
Claires dress is a black Azzaro Dress, and Michelle’s is a navy blue Lanvin dress.
just wanted to share that with you.
I like Michelle’s look more, but Claire’s hair look alot better then Michelle’s, Michelle’s hair is too messy for a red carpet look.
B.S said,
August 1, 2007 @ 11:30 pm
and did u notice, both of them are wearing thre same nail polish, BLACK. Is black nail polish in again ? if yes, what do u think of it ? isn’t it too “gothicy”?